Wednesday, May 27, 2009

House of Mourning

The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning, but the heart of fools is in the house of pleasure.  (Ecclesiastes 7:4)
When I was still teaching youth group, I came across this verse and wrestled with trying to understand it.  Why is wisdom associated with the house of mourning, and why is foolishness associated with the house of pleasure?

I realized that when I'm with my friends, and we're laughing and joking and having a good time, when we're having a blast and in what you might call a house of pleasure, I feel immortal.  Nothing could go wrong, life will always be great like this, everything is happy and beautiful, we are like gods.

In the house of mourning, when we are faced with death or some other misfortune, we are directly confronted by our own mortality.  We were helpless to stop it...  and we have so little power in our hands do anything except to cry out to someone who can.  Things can so easily go wrong, life will not always be grand, and not everything is happy and beautiful.  We are mortals, weak and frail.

And that recognition of our mortality is, I think, why Ecclesiastes says wisdom is found in the house of mourning.

Monday, May 18, 2009

(final version) What is Life?

42.  Ah, if only the answer to the perennial question were that simple.  Recently I've found myself doing a lot of reflection in the days leading up to and following my graduation, and I'd like to take a moment to share the conclusion I've come to about this question.

I'd like to begin with a quote by John Lassetter, one of Pixar's founding members.  The Pixar team was trying to coming up with a story to pitch to Disney, and Lasseter finally hit on an idea that would make their film come together.  Toy Story became wildly successful, and Lassetter explains that his brother had taught him the crucial lesson to ground the fantastic in the everyday.
"To me," he said, "the key is understanding that a man-made object is made for a reason.  And therefore, if it were alive, it would want to serve that purpose more than anything in the world.  A glass is meant to hold liquid, so it's happiest when it's full.  The more you drink from it, the sadder it gets.  When you get to the bottom and it's empty, its biggest hope is to be washed and filled again.  The saddest thing in the world is a paper cup.  What kind of life is that?  It gets this moment of ecstasy - 'I'm filled!' - and then it's drunk from and wadded up and thrown away.  Life's done."
(To Infinity and Beyond! The story of Pixar Animation Studios, page 84)
We have no idea what it'd actually be like to be a paper cup and want to be filled with water; being a paper cup is alien to us.  Yet we connect with that paper cup which wants to fulfill its purpose, as well as the rest of Lassetter's animated lamps and toys which he imbues with life.  There's something about that need to fulfill purpose which resonates with us, something about that deep inner longing which makes the personal narrative of a paper cup so familiar to us.

In the same vein of thought as Lassetter from Pixar, Aristotle said that everything has a nature or essence that determines its function, and that function is what gives it its meaning.  To be a good hammer, you gotta hammer well.  To be a good cup, you gotta be able to hold water.  What is the nature of man?  What are we, what is life?

To be straightforward, I've become fully convinced of the Christian answer to this question: we are created for relationship with God.  Leaving the answer at that would be cheating you the reader, I think, because if the answer I've given is true it has many implications.

Every created thing shares a special relationship with its creator.  A carpenter can take a piece of wood and make a chair, and give that object the shape and form of a chair with its corresponding function and purpose.  Or he can take the same piece of wood, and make a storage chest.  The created object really has no say, and there is a simple fact of the matter that the object has its essence defined by the creator.

Man imperiously rebelled against God, our creator, and we seek to define our own nature, our own function, our own essence.  That's not a sentiment found only in Genesis, but within our own hearts.  We feel it ourselves, that black desire to scorn the words of others so that we can live life the way that we want to.  I feel it in myself when I listen to the words of the poet Henley when he defiantly declares "I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul."

As a result of this rebellion, we have become dysfunctional.  We have all the marks of good creatures gone astray.  Adam Smith in his book "The Wealth of Nations" famously stated that man is driven by rational self-interest, pointing out that it is beyond obvious that the baker bakes your bread not because he cares for you, but because he wants the money you will provide for that bread so that he can buy something for himself.  It's less well-known that before "The Wealth of Nations," he became renown for writing "The Theory of Moral Sentiments," in which he argued that society is held together by compassion, citing as evidence the pain we feel in ourselves when we witness the pain in another, the human capacity for sympathy and care.

We recognize in ourselves this capacity for compassion and good, but we can also see that nearly all of our day-to-day decisions are not driven by a desire to be good, but rather, self-interest.  We have all the signs of creatures created to be good that have gone astray to pursue our own desires.

I want you to imagine with me for a second.  Imagine you are having an argument with a good friend of yours, and you are thoroughly convinced that she is wrong.  If only she'd stop and consider the reasons you're presenting, she'd see that you're right.  You argue with full vigor and passion, but as the argument progresses, it slowly dawns on you she may be right.  No, not only that; she IS right.  It's too late though, you've said too much, you'd be a fool to admit it now.

The conversation ends at an impasse - what now?  No, I don't care, I'm not going to admit that I'm wrong.  You know what, I'm not obligated to admit that I'm wrong.  I'd rather die.

There's a black pleasure of holding onto pride, of holding onto autonomy.  There is also the torment and twisting of the soul that occurs, we are struggling with all our might to protect our image and dignity but we loathe ourselves for it.  I'd like to suggest that that is what hell may be like.  In our refusal to admit that we are wrong, we have separated ourselves from our creator, and hell is God allowing us to have our way.

The question is most often phrased, "who can save us from our sins," but I would like to phrase it "who can save us from ourselves?"  There is one answer:  Jesus Christ.  He took all the guilt and shame of our sins and bore upon himself all the consequences.  We rightly deserve hell, but Jesus suffered hell for us so that we could experience freedom.  Accepting Jesus Christ means freedom.  We were slaves to our sins and desires, but we can now be free to live and love.  Following Jesus Christ means being free to experience the pleasures of being fully human, fully as God intended for us to be.

I'd like to end with probably the most famous of all Bible verses, John 3:16: "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life."  The invitation is open, and everyone makes a choice about this invitation, whether it is to reject it, ignore it, or accept it.  I sincerely implore you, consider it.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

apples and oranges

I was thinking today, it's a common response to say ah you can't compare those, it's like comparing apples and oranges.  That implies that what we can compare are just things of the same kind; apples with apples, oranges with oranges.  But even when we're comparing apples to apples, what if we run into different kinds of differences?  Such as, this apple is nice and big, but this apple is much sweeter.  Here again we're comparing two different kinds of things, size with taste; and aren't we again caught comparing apples and oranges?

What we can do is say well, this apple is big, but this apple is even BIGGER!  This orange is sweet, but this one is even more sweet!  What we're doing, essentially, is looking for Pareto optimality.  I'd take the time to explain Pareto efficiency right now, but I'm lazy + need to study.

The point is that we DO compare apples and oranges.  How else do we decide what car, or laptop to buy?  Very rarely is any product superior to another in every single way, and we need to decide which features or qualities are more important to us.  Learning how to compare and weigh different kinds of qualities with each other seems to be key in making value judgments.

quoting philosophy

sometimes it's bothersome to me that i think in terms of philosophy.  it's just that all of life is the subject matter of philosophy, so it pertains to anything that could come up in a conversation.

like today, during lunch there was a conversation about if you didn't have anything to benefit from a friend, you wouldn't be friends with him.  immediatly that brought to mind Plato, who said that human love is the child of poverty.

oh well.  time to study.

Friday, May 8, 2009

Nerd Workout















I'm really curious to see who appreciates this.  Only the nerdiest of the nerdiest.  *cough* Jon *cough*

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Vision

Definition of "Vision", given by Pastor Ed in a message long ago:
"A picture of the future that galvanizes your energies towards its realization."

On another note... I sat down for econ class feeling just fine, got hit by the sleepy hammer, and then I was knocked out. This happens to me often. I have not yet discovered a foolproof method of defeating the sleepy hammer.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Coinses

I converted all of my nickles and dimes into quarters today using photocopy machines. It brought me great joy.

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Tyranny of the Self

I think my previous post was a little shallow. All I did was to point out that Paul's point is straightforward, without going into more detail about some of these philosophies in particular. I'll do that now.

Here's an example which demonstrates the kind of philosophy which Andy Tung was talking about today at service. It's a poem called "Invictus" (latin for 'unconquered') written by William Henley.
Out of the night that covers me,
Black as the pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbow'd.

Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the Horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

This is a flaunting of the strength of self over circumstances, over anything that the world could bring. My pride finds some of these lines particularly appealing... my heady is bloody, but unbow'd... I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul. That image of standing on my own two feet, reliant on no one, taking on the world with my own might. That imperious defiance, I am my own king, I do what I want!

I think C.S. Lewis would say that that is a picture of hell itself. Why? Because the fact of the matter is that the "I" has been corrupted by sin, and if we really wish to be the captain or king of our souls, God will let us. But sin is intrinsically misery-inducing, and our rule of ourselves becomes a tyranny. (see C.S. Lewis' "The Great Divorce")

In Plato's Republic, the great question is asked whether justice is worthwhile for its own sake, or whether it's only worthwhile for the benefits it brings. In the Republic book IX, praised by scholars for its psychological realism, Plato argues that a life that simply does whatever it wants (a life which completely disregards justice) is a life given over to the desires and lawlessness. And a life governed by this kind of lawlessness is misery itself.

He points out that "in all of us, even in good men, there is a lawless wild-beast nature." When this lawlessness within us grows and takes control, we become more enslaved by wickedness, and worst is when a man has the power to actually carry out all his lusts. Plato concludes:
He who is the real tyrant, whatever men may think, is the real slave, and is obliged to practise the greatest adulation and servility, and to be the flatterer of the vilest of mankind. He has desires which he is utterly unable to satisfy, and has more wants than any one, and is truly poor, if you know how to inspect the whole soul of him: all his life long he is beset with fear and is full of convulsions, and distractions.

See then, how this philosophy of complete reliance on self rather than on Christ is so appealing, but which in the end turns out to be hollow and deceptive. We are not good kings of ourselves; we need a new king, Christ, to rule us and save us from our tyrannous selves.